guinda36 at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 5 23:20:45 EST 2006
I have a question. Thanks for any reaction to my problem.
I Rasch analysed 4 polytomous items with the Winsteps. The items where 4
texts each with 20 gaps to be filled by the test-takers. In order to avoid
the problem of local dependence I considered each text a super item. I had
The item measures are .74, .06, -.29 and -.50.
Then I divided the group into two (a high ability and a low ability group)
on the basis of a reading test which contains 14 dichotomously scored
items. Students with scores from 0 to 7 went into the low ability group and
the ones with scores from 8 to 14 went into the high ability group. The
reading test has a significant but low correlation with the gap fill task
I had 98 cases in the low ability group and 62 cases in the high ability
group. To study the item invariance I separately analysed the data for each
The item measures for the low ability group are: .62, .10, -.25, -.47.
The item measures for the high ability group are: .94, .02, -.38, -.58.
The order of the difficulty of the items remains the same in all three
Question 1: What is the test of invariance for the item measures? Have they
really remained invariant within the allowable range of error?
Tuff to bluff! Get Abhishek before he gets you! Enter the contest
More information about the Rasch