[Rasch] counts to scale conversion
trevor.bond at jcu.edu.au
Mon Jan 23 13:16:22 EST 2006
Am I drinking too much Chinese beer, or do Agustin's 3 options form a
hierarchically ordered set?
At 5:07 PM -0800 22/1/06, Agustin Tristan wrote:
>Hi! I'm trying to follow this topic concerning crickets and scales.
>In abstract: Which is better?
>1) The simple linear model even if it doesn't fit (the
>linear model for the crickets' case).
>2) Any model who permits us to fit the data (the exp(something)
>looks to be like that).
>3) A theoretical model telling us (and the crickets too) how is the
>way crickets should adjust the frequency of the noise they produce
>according to temperature...specially if this theoretical model is
>exp(someting) because it looks more interesting or impressive.
>I like Nature and its relationship with math and for me it was
>interesting to know that crickets may use the exponential (even if
>they don't care about the mathematical formulation), as well as the
>seeds in sunflowers grow exponentially from their center, or the
>snails grow their shell, or the ivy plants grow in an helical 3D
>curve, or the soil slopes (in soil mechanics) become unstable and
>fail according to a logarithmic spiral, or the growth of populations
>follows a logistic model, and so forth... I can also recognize that
>I prefer objective items that behave as the Rasch model, but...I
>cannot decide in all those case which is better between (1), (2) and
Trevor G BOND Ph D
Professor and Head of Dept
Educational Psychology, Counselling & Learning Needs
D2-2F-01A EPCL Dept.
Hong Kong Institute of Education
10 Lo Ping Rd, Tai Po
New Territories HONG KONG
Voice: (852) 2948 8473
Fax: (852) 2948 7983
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rasch