[Rasch] Re: Urgent question
liasonas at lycos.com
Sun Jan 29 04:19:48 EST 2006
I have a very urgent question, anyone who can contribute, please do so
We use the t-scores (z scores) of the examinees on high stakes tests to sort them according to their ability.
When the distribution of the raw scores deviates a lot from the normal, then the t-scores look a bit 'strange'. Do you also agree that t-scores can not be used when the distribution deviates substantially from the normal?
Also, I can transform the raw scores using y=ln(x/(100-x)) and the distribution of the raw scores becomes normal. Then, I can get more 'beautiful' t scores (z scores). Am I allowed to use this transformation and then get the t scores?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Linacre (RMT)" <rmt at rasch.org>
> To: rasch at acer.edu.au
> Subject: [Rasch] Different models: counts to scale conversion
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:58:51 -0600
> Not sure about the contrast "log-scaled" vs. "Rasch-scaled"
> Georg Rasch based his theory on the Poisson model, which is a Rasch
> model and is a log-scaling model. It seems the actual contrast is
> between a Rasch-Poisson model and a Rasch rating-scale-type model.
> Mike L.
> Earlier remark:
> > When I was predicting the amount of money that a counselor was
> > going to be sued for a bad outcome based the hierarchical
> > complexity of the informed consent procedure. Log money did the
> > best. Right behind it by just a little worse .96 versus .94 was
> > Rasch scaled money. The value of money has been argued to
> > require loging for years.
> Rasch mailing list
> Rasch at acer.edu.au
Dr. Iasonas Lamprianou
CFAS, School of Education
The University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Tel. 0044 161 275 3485
iasonas.lamprianou at man.ac.uk
Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number. -Lycos Yellow Pages
More information about the Rasch