[Rasch] Bias in JMLE
Mike Linacre (RMT)
rmt at rasch.org
Sat Aug 2 18:29:06 EST 2008
Thank you for your questions, Anthony.
In the psychometric literature, the terms "bias" and "inconsistency" are
usually used in the context of the estimation of the difficulties of
dichotomous items in a fixed length test administered to a sample of persons.
If the sample size is infinite, and the resulting item estimates are their
true values, then the estimates are consistent.
If the sample size is finite, and the expectations of the possible item
estimates are their true values, then the estimates are unbiased.
JMLE estimates are inconsistent and biased. They are less central than the
true values. For instance, if the test consists of two dichotomous items,
then, with an infinite sample, the JMLE estimate of the difference between
the two item difficulties will be twice the true value.
Ben Wright and Graham Douglas discovered that the multiplier (L-1)/L is an
approximate correction for JMLE item bias, where L is the test length. For
a two-item test this correction would be (2-1)/2 = 0.5 . It is implemented
in Winsteps with STBIAS=YES. There is much more about this in Winsteps Help
at http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?ebiascorrection.htm
Mike L.
At 8/1/2008, you wrote:
>It is documented in the literature that JMLE is biased.
>What does this mean?
>What is meant by bias or inconsistency in JMLE?
>Is the correction factor K-1/K is multiplied by JMLE estimates?
Mike Linacre
Editor, Rasch Measurement Transactions
rmt at rasch.org www.rasch.org/rmt/ Latest RMT: 21:4 Spring 2008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20080802/7d53e109/attachment.html
More information about the Rasch
mailing list