[Rasch] General Procedure for Testing Validity and ReliabilityUsing Rasch

Parisa Daftari Fard pdaftaryfard at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 17 14:06:28 EST 2008


"There is plenty of "mess" in Messick!"  
 
I should highly appreciate you if you let us know what kind of mess is Messick??? Is there any article Denny Borsboom has published. 
 
Regards,
Parisa

--- On Fri, 8/15/08, Andrew Kyngdon <akyngdon at lexile.com> wrote:

From: Andrew Kyngdon <akyngdon at lexile.com>
Subject: RE: [Rasch] General Procedure for Testing Validity and ReliabilityUsing Rasch
To: talilij at yahoo.com, rasch at acer.edu.au
Date: Friday, August 15, 2008, 10:53 AM

Juanito,
 
I would be reading what Denny Borsboom has to say about validity, rather than
Messick. There is plenty of "mess" in Messick!
 
Andrew

________________________________

From: rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au on behalf of Juanito Talili
Sent: Wed 8/13/2008 3:18 AM
To: rasch at acer.edu.au
Subject: [Rasch] General Procedure for Testing Validity and ReliabilityUsing
Rasch


Hello Rasch modelers,
 
I want to know how Rasch validate an instrument.  That is, what is the general
procedure for testing validity and reliability of an instrument using Rasch
methodology?  Comments are welcome.
 
Thank you.
 
Juanito Talili
Spain

_______________________________________________
Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au
https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/rasch



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20080816/2d8d2161/attachment.html 


More information about the Rasch mailing list