[Rasch] Rasch analysis of interval data
Michael Lamport Commons
commons at tiac.net
Thu Jul 24 03:35:57 EST 2008
My model of hierarchical complexity is psychophysical and substantive.
It is suggested as a way of replacing IQ. In its application to social
perspective taking skill, it is to measure and explain much of
Stephen Humphry wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong. Psychology needs explicit theories of cognitive
>> processes of the kind you have developed. It desperately needs more
>> Piagets than it does Fred Lords. The truly disturbing thing about the
>> behavioural sciences is the attitude of whilst it is nice to have
>> "substantive theory", it's not necessary for measurement. On the
>> contrary, if we are genuinely measuring a natural system, then our
>> "substantive" and "measurement" theories are one and the same thing,
>> from a realist perspective. Instead, psychometricians are always hoping
>> the practitioners will provide the substantive theory, whilst the
>> practitioners seem to think that psychometric models actually provide
>> this. This kind of thinking pervades and dominates the SEM and HLM
>> lands, for example.
> Hear hear!
> Rasch mailing list
> Rasch at acer.edu.au
More information about the Rasch