[Rasch] RE: Open Source tools

Fischer, Felix Felix.Fischer at charite.de
Sun Jan 31 20:09:25 EST 2010


R with package ltm is open source software and might fit (all) your needs.

http://cran.r-project.org/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ltm/
http://www.statmethods.net/index.html

Regards
Felix


________________________________________
Von: rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au [rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au] im Auftrag von rasch-request at acer.edu.au [rasch-request at acer.edu.au]
Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Januar 2010 23:33
An: rasch at acer.edu.au
Betreff: Rasch Digest, Vol 54, Issue 12

Send Rasch mailing list submissions to
        rasch at acer.edu.au

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/rasch
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        rasch-request at acer.edu.au

You can reach the person managing the list at
        rasch-owner at acer.edu.au

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Rasch digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: CAT Questions (Agustin Tristan)
   2. Re: Open Source tools (Mike Linacre (RMT))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:43:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Agustin Tristan <ici_kalt at yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [Rasch] CAT Questions
To: ranganaths <ranganath.s at excelindia.com>, Rasch <rasch at acer.edu.au>
Message-ID: <790396.19446.qm at web111504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Ranganath, I am not informed about open source software. I think that Winsteps, RUMM or CONQUEST are very good options to work with.
regards
Agustin


INSITUTO DE EVALUACIÓN E INGENIERIA AVANZADA.
Ave. Cordillera Occidental  No. 635
Colonia  Lomas 4ª San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí.
C.P.  78216   MEXICO
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 76
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 77
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 78
web page (in Spanish): http://www.ieia.com.mx
web page (in English) http://www.ieesa-kalt.com/English/Frames_sp_pro.html

--- On Sat, 1/30/10, ranganaths <ranganath.s at excelindia.com> wrote:


From: ranganaths <ranganath.s at excelindia.com>
Subject: RE: [Rasch] CAT Questions
To: "'Agustin Tristan'" <ici_kalt at yahoo.com>, "'Rasch'" <rasch at acer.edu.au>
Date: Saturday, January 30, 2010, 6:56 AM








Hello,

            Is there any open source software available equivalent to Winsteps which can handle thousands of users and hundreds of Items?

Regards,
Ranganath S




From: Agustin Tristan [mailto:ici_kalt at yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:05 PM
To: ranganaths; Rasch
Subject: RE: [Rasch] CAT Questions






Hello, I can explain because I have worked in the translation of Baker´s book and the adaptation of software into Spanish. The quote concerning the limitations is clearly related to the program and the algorithms included in the software by Baker provided with the book, but not to the Rasch model itself. You may use a software like Winsteps without problems with more than several thousands of persons!

Regards

Agustin Tristan



INSTITUTO DE EVALUACION E INGENIERIA AVANZADA.

Ave. Cordillera Occidental  No. 635
Colonia  Lomas 4ª San Luis Potosí , San Luis Potosí .
C.P.  78216   MEXICO
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 76
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 77
 (52) (444) 8 25 50 78
web page (in Spanish): http://www.ieia.com.mx

web page (in English) http://www.ieesa-kalt.com/English/Frames_sp_pro.html


--- On Fri, 1/29/10, ranganaths < ranganath.s at excelindia.com > wrote:

From: ranganaths < ranganath.s at excelindia.com >
Subject: RE: [Rasch] CAT Questions
To: "'Mike Linacre (RMT)'" <rmt at rasch.org>
Cc: rasch at acer.edu.au
Date: Friday, January 29, 2010, 5:28 AM


Hello,

            Thanks for the response. I am referring to the book THE BASICS OF ITEM RESPONSE THEORY by Frank Baker. In this book he says. I quote
“There are three different item characteristic curve models to choose from and several different ways to implement the Birnbaum paradigm. From these, the author has chosen to present the approach based upon the one-parameter logistic (Rasch) model as implemented by Benjamin Wright and his coworkers in the BICAL computer program. Under this model, each item has only one parameter to be estimated. The procedures work well with small numbers of test items and small numbers of examinees.”

            We have a product which administers tests to thousands of people and having hundreds of Items in the test. The above quote gives a warning for such kind of applications. I wish to know If this is true which model should be used for the kind of tests we are administering? Thanks once again for the response.


Regards,
Ranganath S




From: Mike Linacre (RMT) [mailto:rmt at rasch.org]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:29 AM
To: ranganaths
Subject: RE: [Rasch] CAT Questions

Thank you for your further questions, Ranganath.

1. and 2. - No and No.  No need to pre-calibrate. No need to pre-administer. See, for instance, www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt52b.htm "CAT with a Poorly Calibrated Item Bank". But the initial results will be approximate (but useful) until you have collected enough data to properly calibrate the item bank. See also www.rasch.org/memo69.htm and www.rasch.org/memo40.htm

3. and 4. - What is the "conventional methodology"?  Is it Classical Test Theory (CTT, linear analysis of scored test responses) or Paper-and-Pencil (PAP) tests?

Rasch methodology can have considerable advantages over CTT.
CAT can have considerable advantages over PAP.
But the advantages depend on the situation.

For instance, in remedial teaching, you can combine a Rasch-based CAT test with computerized instruction, so that the student is automatically tutored on the topic-areas for which the CAT test reports poor performance.

Cordially,
Mike L.

At 1/28/2010, you wrote:


Hi,
     Thanks for the response. I still have a doubt about the practical implementation of the IRT.

1. Lets assume that I have started IRT from scratch. I have a list of questions to be administered to a group. For each of the question I know only whether the question is easy, medium or hard, the values of

    the item parameters are unknown for me. Is it required to calibrate the items in the test and find out the item parameters before it is administered? If yes

2. Is it required to administer each and every new item to a sample group ascertaining the item parameters before it is given to the real examinees?

3. What advantage does the IRT implementation gives to the tutor who is supposed to take the remedial teaching, which anyway can also be taken from any kind of conventional testing methodology?

4. I have read in an article that the CAT helps in reducing the test timings and also it could be administered at time independent fashion still measuring the examinees ability on the same scale, Are these the only advantages of using IRT? IF any other advantage is there over the conventional methodology please explain.



Regards,

Ranganath S

Mike Linacre
Editor, Rasch Measurement Transactions
rmt at rasch.org www.rasch.org/rmt/ Latest RMT:  23:2 Autumn 2009
-------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before you print

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au
https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/rasch





-------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before you print
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20100130/ad6b1632/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:13:37 -0600
From: "Mike Linacre (RMT)" <rmt at rasch.org>
Subject: Re: [Rasch] Open Source tools
To: rasch at acer.edu.au
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20100130161137.00c3f588 at rasch.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Ranganath:

Please see the available software at www.rasch.org/software.htm

Mike L.

At 1/30/2010, you wrote:
>  Is there any open source software which does ability as well as item
> parameter estimation given just the correct choices of the items in the
> test and the response vector of each examinees. Thanks in advance.

Mike Linacre
Editor, Rasch Measurement Transactions
rmt at rasch.org www.rasch.org/rmt/ Latest RMT:  23:2 Autumn 2009

-------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before you print
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20100130/d1af501d/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au
https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/rasch


End of Rasch Digest, Vol 54, Issue 12
*************************************

-------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before you print



More information about the Rasch mailing list