[Rasch] Empirical order & Theoretical order
ici_kalt at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 4 11:10:34 EST 2010
Certainly the Rasch model is out of the problem. Only when a person wants to preserve the theory then he/she has to look for another model fitting the data. This is not our approach I think.
Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel
From: Trevor Bond <trevor.bond at jcu.edu.au>
Sender: rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:44:40
To: Parisa Daftari Fard<pdaftaryfard at yahoo.com>; rasch list<rasch at acer.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [Rasch] Empirical order & Theoretical order
The topic sounds interesting. I believe that When we do not have an agreement
between Rach model and Theoretical model, there are three possibilities
1. Rasch model requires revision
2. Theory requires revision
3. Items requires revision
One of the 1, 2, or 3 should be revised.
At the moment, I am not willing to choose 1 - the Rasch model seems to be best
we have for our task of constructing and monitoring variables at this point.
Here's an example of Rasch meets Piaget, where revision to Piaget's theory AND
Inhelder's methodology are recommended:
Bond, T.G. & Bunting, E. (1995). Piaget and measurement III: Reassessing the
méthode clinique. Archives de Psychologie, 63, 231-255.
Prof Trevor G BOND
School of Education
James Cook University
mob: +61 416 82 70 83
Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au
More information about the Rasch