[Rasch] Use of e in the Rasch model

Kenji Yamazaki yk0271 at yahoo.co.jp
Tue Sep 6 03:45:44 EST 2011


Hi all:

 

I have a question about the formula of the Rasch or IRT model.  Why is e (=2.718) used in the formula?  Why is not it 10?  Because e is close to 3, why isn’t 3 used for the formula instead
of e?  I have been having this question for
a long time, but all the Rasch and IRT books I have read treat as given the use of e (=2.718) in the formula.  If anyone gives me an answer,
it will be very appreciated.
Kenji 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20110906/ca5ea711/attachment.html 


More information about the Rasch mailing list