[Rasch] c-parameter

Purya Baghaei puryabaghaei at gmail.com
Sat Jun 2 15:45:20 EST 2012

What I found exciting was that the paper says:

"...the c-parameter of 3PLM should not be interpreted as a guessing
parameter. This study found logical, empirical evidence showing that
neither the a-, b-, or c parameters of 3PLM can accurately reflect the
discrimination, difficulty, and guessing properties of an item,

I read of of problems associated with IRT, but didn't know they were so serious.


On 5/31/12, Tom Conner <connert at msu.edu> wrote:
> Not sure why it is exciting.  It just brings up the old issue of
> changing the model if it doesn't fit (e.g., adding parameters at the
> expense of measurement properties) or keeping the model and its
> measurement properties and do things like modify items or administration
> conditions.
> Tom
> On 5/31/12 4:39 AM, Purya Baghaei wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> Have you seen this? Very exciting!
>> http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n1.pdf
>> Purya
> --
> Tom Conner
> Professor Emeritus
> Department of Sociology
> Michigan State University
> "What if there were no hypothetical questions?"
> _______________________________________________
> Rasch mailing list
> Rasch at acer.edu.au
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/options/rasch/puryabaghaei%40gmail.com

Purya Baghaei, Ph.D
English Department,
Islamic Azad University,
Ostad Yusofi St.
91871-Mashhad, Iran.
Phone: +98 511 6635064-5
Fax: +98 511 6634763

More information about the Rasch mailing list