[Rasch] WINSTEP or FACETS for Speaking Rating scales

Mohamad Imanian mohamad_imanian at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 10:51:36 EST 2012


Dear Professor Linacre, 

I prefer to keep WINSTEPS and buy FACETS as well.  Thanks for your offer. 

All the best 

Mohamad Imanian 




>________________________________
> From: Mike Linacre <rmt at rasch.org>
>To: rasch at acer.edu.au 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:45 AM
>Subject: Re: [Rasch] WINSTEP or FACETS for Speaking Rating scales
> 
>Mohammed:
>
>To exchange Facets for Winsteps, please email me personally.
>
>For a comparison of Winsteps and Facets, see www.winsteps.com/winfac.htm
>
>Mike Linacre
>mike at winsteps.com
>
>At 6/25/2012, you wrote:
>>As I have communicated with the group before, rating scales can be 
>>validated by WINSTEP and I have bought the software. Today I encountered a 
>>study which used FACETS for validating a speaking rating scale. To give 
>>you a preview of the problem
>>I have a rating scale with seven rating criteria. 5 Judges assess the 
>>performnce of the students in the speaking test.
>>My big question is why some people use FACETS not WINSTEPS although the 
>>Winsteps.com (homepage)has suggested WINSTEP for rating scales? It seems I 
>>have to sell my WINSTEP and buy a FACET. Right?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rasch mailing list
>Rasch at acer.edu.au
>Unsubscribe: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/options/rasch/mohamad_imanian%40yahoo.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20120625/21bb8f67/attachment.html 


More information about the Rasch mailing list