[Rasch] Negative pt-bis and fit of 1.0? How can this be?
slu at ccsr.uchicago.edu
Wed Mar 7 08:53:14 EST 2012
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:36 -0600, Stuart Luppescu wrote:
> Are you saying that if I just generated 1's and 0's randomly and tried
> to calibrate them they would all fit? Hmmm. I'm going to have to try
Very interesting, indeed! Of course, you get 0 reliability and
point-biserials near 0, but all the fit statistics are very close to
1.0! Mark Moulton gets a beer next time I see him for providing the
instructional moment of the day.
Stuart Luppescu -=- slu .at. ccsr.uchicago.edu
University of Chicago -=- CCSR
才文と智奈美の父 -=- Kernel 3.2.1-gentoo-r2
Trevor Hastie: It would be great to have a
'clickable' digest, where the topics list is a set
of pointers, and clicking on a topic takes you to
that entry. Jeff Gentry: I sincerely hope you
don't mean that you wish HTML enabled content in
the actual emails coming through the mailing list.
People who send HTML in email text should be taken
out back and shot :) Peter Dalgaard: Pretty much
what my spam filter does... Well, it kills the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3573 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20120306/c676534a/attachment.bin
More information about the Rasch