[Rasch] Negative pt-bis and fit of 1.0? How can this be?
markhmoulton at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 10:05:51 EST 2012
Cool! See you in Vancouver.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Luppescu <slu at ccsr.uchicago.edu>wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:36 -0600, Stuart Luppescu wrote:
> > Are you saying that if I just generated 1's and 0's randomly and tried
> > to calibrate them they would all fit? Hmmm. I'm going to have to try
> > that....
> Very interesting, indeed! Of course, you get 0 reliability and
> point-biserials near 0, but all the fit statistics are very close to
> 1.0! Mark Moulton gets a beer next time I see him for providing the
> instructional moment of the day.
> Stuart Luppescu -=- slu .at. ccsr.uchicago.edu
> University of Chicago -=- CCSR
> 才文と智奈美の父 -=- Kernel 3.2.1-gentoo-r2
> Trevor Hastie: It would be great to have a
> 'clickable' digest, where the topics list is a set
> of pointers, and clicking on a topic takes you to
> that entry. Jeff Gentry: I sincerely hope you
> don't mean that you wish HTML enabled content in
> the actual emails coming through the mailing list.
> People who send HTML in email text should be taken
> out back and shot :) Peter Dalgaard: Pretty much
> what my spam filter does... Well, it kills the
> Rasch mailing list
> Rasch at acer.edu.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rasch