[Rasch] Rasch vc CFA
trevor.bond at jcu.edu.au
Sat Sep 29 09:51:24 EST 2012
Yes, I know of those who use CFA to find the factors and then subject each factor to RM.
Why? I don't know.
I'd rather start with a theory which describes how the variable should look, and use RM to examine that…
From: Michael Lamport Commons <commons at tiac.net<mailto:commons at tiac.net>>
Reply-To: "rasch at acer.edu.au<mailto:rasch at acer.edu.au>" <rasch at acer.edu.au<mailto:rasch at acer.edu.au>>
Date: Saturday, 29 September 2012 3:07 AM
To: "rasch at acer.edu.au<mailto:rasch at acer.edu.au>" <rasch at acer.edu.au<mailto:rasch at acer.edu.au>>
Subject: Re: [Rasch] Rasch vc CFA
The only problem I have is should I use factor analysis to find the a-priori dimensions. I always follow up with a Rasch Analysis. Two things were left out The number of types of questions makes a big difference and the culture of the respondents. With Rasch, this does not seem to be the case to any degree.
Michael Lamport Commons, Ph.D.
Assistant Clinical Professor
Department of Psychiatry
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Harvard Medical School
234 Huron Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138-1328
Telephone (617) 497-5270
Facsimile (617) 491-5270
Cellular (617) 320–0896
Commons at tiac.net<mailto:Commons at tiac.net>http://dareassociation.org/
On 9/28/2012 2:16 AM, Bond, Trevor wrote:
Just like fit to the Rasch model...
but real life is not perfect!
Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au<mailto:Rasch at acer.edu.au>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rasch