[Rasch] local independence

Tyner, Callie callietyner at PHHP.UFL.EDU
Fri Sep 6 02:20:48 EST 2013

Thanks Mike for the input

I got the idea to examine EFA residuals from the PROMIS (Reeve, et al., 2007) paper on item calibration  [Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., … Cella, D. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22-S31. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04]

Here the authors give the following methods for assessing items:
II. Evaluate Assumptions of the Item Response Theory (IRT) Model
A. Unidimensionality
     1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using polychoric correlations (one-factor and bi-factor models)
     2. Exploratory Factor Analysis will be performed if CFA shows poor fit
B. Local independence
     1. Examine residual correlation matrix after first factor removed in factor analysis
     2. IRT-based tests of local dependence
C. Monotonicity
1. Graph item mean scores conditional on total score minus item score
2. Examine initial probability functions from nonparametric IRT models

I've underlined the part that references looking at the residual correlation matrix from the factor analysis.  Are other people not using this method?

Thanks all for the edification and discussion,

From: rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au [rasch-bounces at acer.edu.au] on behalf of Mike Linacre [mike at winsteps.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:55 AM
To: rasch at acer.edu.au
Subject: Re: [Rasch] local independence

Thank you for the questions, Callie.

EFA residuals are not the same as Rasch residuals. EFA residuals are
"observed correlations - expected correlations"

Rasch residuals are "observed data values - expected data values". They
are correlated by pairs of items (variables) across persons (cases) in
Winsteps Table 23.99.

If there are large EFA residuals, then some possibilities are (1) more
factors need to be extracted, or (2) the data need to be transformed, or
(3) the data need to be pruned.

I cannot see a direct connection between EFA residuals and local
independence, perhaps someone else can ....

Mike L.

On 9/5/2013 7:24 AM, Tyner, Callie wrote:
> Thanks Scott,
> I am looking at this here:
> http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?table23_99.htm
> Do you know what "TAP" means in the example table? I'm trying to
> understand how to interpret this table.
> I've been running my EFA and residual correlations in R, where the
> output is more of a traditional correlation matrix.
> Thanks for your help!
> -Callie

Rasch mailing list
Rasch at acer.edu.au
Unsubscribe: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/mailman/options/rasch/callietyner%40phhp.ufl.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailinglist.acer.edu.au/pipermail/rasch/attachments/20130905/dd648de9/attachment.html 

More information about the Rasch mailing list